Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025

    SIU v Dlamini and Others

    June 25, 2025

    [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

    June 20, 2025

    What about the Zondo Commission?

    June 4, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Progress ReportProgress Report
    • News
    • Contact us
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • Home
    • Monitoring Corruption
      • Who we are
      • Our mission
      • Why our campaign matters
      • Our objectives
    • Success Stories
      • Special Tribunal Cases
        • SIU v Digital Vibes (Pty) Ltd and Others
        • SIU and Eskom ABB Corruption Settlement
        • SIU and Transnet v Dynamic Power Case
        • SIU v Ledla Case
        • SIU v SAP Case
        • SIU and Another v Ndlovu and Others case
      • SCCC Cases
        • The State v Hildegard Antionette Pieterse
        • The State v Michelle Nunes and Rudi John Baker
    • Accountability
      • Civil vs. Criminal Cases in corruption prosecutions
      • Special Tribunal
        • All about the Special Tribunal
          • The Special Tribunal: Fighting Corruption in South Africa
          • What is the Special Tribunal?
          • Key functions of the Special Tribunal
          • How does the Special Tribunal work?
          • The Special Investigating Unit (SIU)
          • Key powers of the SIU
          • SIU expertise
          • How do the SIU and Special Tribunal work together?
          • Unique features of the Special Tribunal
          • Is the Special Tribunal a Court?
          • Why is the Special Tribunal important?
        • Special Tribunal Timeline
        • Who sits on the Special Tribunal?
        • Success of the Special Tribunal
      • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
        • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
          • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
          • What are Commercial Crimes?
          • What are the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts?
          • Why were the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts set up?
          • What is the Specialised Commercial Crimes Unit and how does it work?
          • Where are the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts and how many are there?
      • View all current corruption cases on Law.Library
    • Updates
      • Cases
      • News
    Visit Judges Matter
    Progress ReportProgress Report
    Home»Cases»SIU and Transnet v Dynamic Power Case
    Cases

    SIU and Transnet v Dynamic Power Case

    February 20, 20254 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    SIU and Transnet Soc Ltd v Dynamic Power Engineering (Pty) Ltd and Others: Holding officials accountable for Tender Fraud and illicit gains

    The judgment handed down by the President of the Special Tribunal, Judge Victor on 12 February 2025 is the latest success story of the Special Tribunal, in a matter that had been litigated since 2022.

    The case, involving Transnet SOC Limited as the second applicant and Dynamic Power Engineering (Pty) Ltd, previously Superfecta Trading 209 (Pty) Ltd dealt with fraudulent conduct in relation to a tender awarded by Transnet to Dynamic Power, and five luxury properties belonging to two high-ranking Transnet officials, namely Zakhele Lebelo and Phathutshedzo Mashamba, which they fraudulently funded and acquired by means of money received from service providers contracted by Transnet.

    View the case

    Background

    On 8 August 2022, the Special Tribunal granted a preservation order over properties belonging to Mr Lebelo and Mr Mashamba. On 1 November 2022, the SIU and Transnet launched a review application in the Special Tribunal where they sought that:

    • Dynamic Power be directed to pay Transnet R8 540 641.00, the net profit it earned as a result of the tender awarded to Dynamic Power for the installation of two generators for the Carlton Centre precinct, and the net profit it earned as a result of its appointment as the contractor for electrical and mechanical services at Transnet’s Carlton Centre precinct.
    • Mr Lebelo be directed to pay to Transnet R5 182 767.73 amounting to a bribe, gratification and secret profits he unlawfully received while employed at Transnet, and R100 000.00 amounting to a bribe, gratification and secret profits he unlawfully received following his resignation from Transnet, for his role in Dynamic Power’s contracts with Transnet; and
    • Mr Mashamba be directed to pay Transnet R2 300 000.00 amounting to a bribe, gratification and secret profits he unlawfully received while employed at Transnet, for his role in Dynamic Power’s contracts with Transnet, and R5 113 255.00 amounting to a bribe, gratification and secret profits he unlawfully received while employed at Transnet, for his role in the second respondent’s contracts with Transnet.

    Special Tribunal’s ruling

    Dynamic Power launched civil proceedings in the High Court against Transnet on 23 October 2023. The parties subsequently agreed to settle both matters, with the Special Tribunal handing down its order on 12 February 2025, ordering amongst other things, that:

    • The decision to award the tender to Dynamic Power for the installation of two generators for the Carlton Centre precinct and the resulting contract was inconsistent with the Constitution, unlawful and invalid, and was thus reviewed and set aside.
    • The decision to appoint Dynamic Power as the maintenance contractor for electrical and mechanical services at Transnet’s Carlton Centre precinct and the resulting contract was inconsistent with the Constitution, unlawful and invalid, and was thus reviewed and set aside.
    • Dynamic Power is directed to pay R3 091 605.76 to Transnet in 3 instalments on 3 March, 3 April, and 3 May 2025.
    • Mr Lebelo is indebted to Transnet in the amount of R5 282 767.73, which debt shall be recovered by Transnet by the payment of Mr Lebelo’s Transnet Retirement Fund and the proceeds of the sale of the relevant, fraudulently acquired properties to Transnet; and
    • Mr Mashamba is indebted to Transnet in the amount of R7 413 255.00, which debt shall be recovered by Transnet by the payment of Mr Mashamba’s Transnet Retirement Fund and the proceeds of the sale of the relevant, fraudulently acquired property to Transnet.

     

    Timeline of events

    Date Event
    18 January 2016 Tender awarded to Dynamic Power.
    22 October 2017 Appointment of Dynamic Power as contractor
    8 August 2022 Preservation Order granted
    1 November 2022  Review Application launched by SIU and Transnet
    23 October 2023 Civil Proceedings launched by Dynamic Power
    12 February 2025 Final Order granted by Special Tribunal

    Conclusion

    The SIU and Transnet v Dynamic Power and Others case is an important one in South Africa’s anti-corruption efforts, reinforcing accountability the tender process. The decision showcases the Tribunal’s power to order preservation orders, the sale of property, and the payment of retirement funds to recover money lost through corruption.

    View the case
    Corruption fraud SIU Special Tribunal Tender Fraud
    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Previous ArticleSIU v Ledla Case
    Next Article The State v Michelle Nunes and Rudi John Baker

    Related Posts

    News

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025
    Cases

    SIU v Dlamini and Others

    June 25, 2025
    News

    What about the Zondo Commission?

    June 4, 2025
    Cases

    Marubini Ramatsekisa v SIU and Others

    May 23, 2025
    News

    Landmark case tests South Africa’s anti-corruption powers

    May 16, 2025
    Cases

    SIU v Mosokodi Business Trust and Others

    May 13, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025

    SIU v Dlamini and Others

    June 25, 2025

    [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

    June 20, 2025

    What about the Zondo Commission?

    June 4, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    About Us
    About Us

    The Progress Report delivers clear, factual reporting on South Africa’s fight against corruption, focusing on the efforts of the Special Tribunal and Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts.
    We track key cases, provide in-depth analysis of judgments, and advocate for critical reforms to enhance transparency and accountability. Our mission is to spotlight successes in recovering stolen funds, identify challenges faced by these institutions, and rebuild public trust in the justice system.

    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Latest News

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025

    [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

    June 20, 2025

    What about the Zondo Commission?

    June 4, 2025
    Cases in the Spotlight

    SIU v Dlamini and Others

    June 25, 2025

    Marubini Ramatsekisa v SIU and Others

    May 23, 2025

    SIU v Mosokodi Business Trust and Others

    May 13, 2025
    • Homepage
    © 2025 The Progress Report. Designed by Edge Digital.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.