Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    State Capture update: Transnet and Nedbank interest rate swaps settlement

    January 20, 2026

    South Africa is off the FATF Greylist

    October 29, 2025

    SIU V Zakheni Strategic Supplies (Pty) Ltd and Others

    August 25, 2025

    SIU V Bendalo Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others

    August 19, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Progress ReportProgress Report
    • News
    • Contact us
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • Home
    • Monitoring Corruption
      • Who we are
      • Our mission
      • Why our campaign matters
      • Our objectives
    • Success Stories
      • Special Tribunal Cases
        • SIU v Digital Vibes (Pty) Ltd and Others
        • SIU and Eskom ABB Corruption Settlement
        • SIU and Transnet v Dynamic Power Case
        • SIU v Ledla Case
        • SIU v SAP Case
        • SIU and Another v Ndlovu and Others case
      • SCCC Cases
        • The State v Hildegard Antionette Pieterse
        • The State v Michelle Nunes and Rudi John Baker
    • Accountability
      • Civil vs. Criminal Cases in corruption prosecutions
      • Special Tribunal
        • All about the Special Tribunal
          • The Special Tribunal: Fighting Corruption in South Africa
          • What is the Special Tribunal?
          • Key functions of the Special Tribunal
          • How does the Special Tribunal work?
          • The Special Investigating Unit (SIU)
          • Key powers of the SIU
          • SIU expertise
          • How do the SIU and Special Tribunal work together?
          • Unique features of the Special Tribunal
          • Is the Special Tribunal a Court?
          • Why is the Special Tribunal important?
        • Special Tribunal Timeline
        • Who sits on the Special Tribunal?
        • Success of the Special Tribunal
          • Full list of Special Tribunal Cases
      • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
        • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
          • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
          • What are Commercial Crimes?
          • What are the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts?
          • Why were the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts set up?
          • What is the Specialised Commercial Crimes Unit and how does it work?
          • Where are the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts and how many are there?
      • View all current corruption cases on Law.Library
    • Updates
      • Cases
      • News
    Visit Judges Matter
    Progress ReportProgress Report
    Home»News»Special Tribunal in crisis
    News

    Special Tribunal in crisis

    July 19, 20244 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email

    Anti-corruption fight stalls amid leadership void in Special Tribunal

    The resignation of Judge Lebogang Modiba as the President of the Special Tribunal has plunged the institution into a state of crisis, severely stalling its crucial role in the fight against corruption. Despite the urgency of the situation, no replacement has been found, leaving the Tribunal unable to function effectively since May 2024.

    Judge Modiba, a respected and pivotal figure in the Special Tribunal, resigned in March 2024, which took effect at the end of June. Her departure has left the Tribunal with no active judges, exacerbating the challenges faced by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) in combating economic crimes.

    A brief history and Modiba’s impact

    Established on October 1, 2019, the Special Tribunal was created to expedite the SIU’s applications to freeze and confiscate proceeds of corruption, bypassing the overburdened High Courts. The Tribunal’s establishment marked a significant step forward in the government’s anti-corruption efforts.

    In May 2022, Judge Lebogang Modiba was named President of the Special Tribunal. Her appointment, alongside Judges Johannes Daffue and Soma Naidoo, brought hope and momentum to the institution. Modiba, a Judge of the Gauteng High Court and a member of the Electoral Court had been an integral part of the Tribunal since its inception.

    During her tenure, Judge Modiba proved to be the rock of the Tribunal. She managed an overwhelming majority of the cases, personally handling 78 out of 107 matters brought before the Tribunal. Her dedication and firm, fair approach earned her respect and admiration.

    The Tribunal in crisis

    Judge Modiba’s resignation has left the Tribunal in disarray. The Department of Justice, which seems to have dropped the ball on replacing her since she emailed them her resignation in March, has been scrambling to address the situation. The last ruling by the Tribunal was in May, and without active judges, the SIU has been forced to approach the High Courts, which are already burdened with backlogs.

    The Tribunal’s effective collapse has serious implications for the SIU, which has several high-profile cases ready for hearing but cannot process them.

    The importance of resuscitating the Tribunal

    The Special Tribunal is a cornerstone of the SIU’s efforts to recover assets lost to corruption. Its swift and focused approach has been instrumental in securing preservation orders and freezing illicit proceeds. Without it, the SIU’s effectiveness is severely hampered.

    Judge Modiba’s departure has highlighted systemic issues within the Tribunal, including inadequate support and resources from the Department of Justice. The Tribunal’s dependence on high court judges, who receive no extra compensation for their Tribunal work, has further complicated its operations. More importantly, it has highlighted the uncomfortable relationship with the Executive. The current structure of the Tribunal does not support judicial independence as the Tribunal falls under the Department of Justice and the President decides which matters will be heard by the Tribunal. This is troubling especially as the Tribunal deals with matters where members of the Executive may be implicated. The work of such a specialist body needs to be insulated from the Executive.

    There is an urgent need to consider legislative reform that establishes Specialist High Courts which fall under the Office of the Chief Justice rather than having a Tribunal

    The Special Tribunal, since its establishment in 2019, has been a vital evolution in the fight against economic crimes in South Africa. Judge Modiba’s tenure demonstrated the Tribunal’s potential to deliver justice swiftly and effectively. Her resignation, however, has exposed significant vulnerabilities that must be addressed urgently. Reviving the Special Tribunal is crucial to maintaining the momentum in the fight against corruption. The government must act swiftly to appoint new leadership and judges, ensuring that the Tribunal can continue its critical work, whilst at the same time considering the necessary legislative reforms needed to strengthen the independence of such a body and to ensure that it continues to be able to attract our best judges to hear the matters.

    Read more:

    Business Live. Author: Tauriq Moosa | https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/2024-07-16-special-tribunal-in-limbo-after-heads-departure/

    GroundUp. Author: Ray Joseph | https://www.theprogressreport.org.za/2024/07/17/ronald-lamola-let-anti-corruption-body-collapse/

    Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Previous ArticleRonald Lamola let anti-corruption body collapse
    Next Article Corruption in South Africa: The Perception vs. Reality

    Related Posts

    News

    State Capture update: Transnet and Nedbank interest rate swaps settlement

    January 20, 2026
    News

    South Africa is off the FATF Greylist

    October 29, 2025
    News

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025
    News

    [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

    June 20, 2025
    News

    What about the Zondo Commission?

    June 4, 2025
    News

    Landmark case tests South Africa’s anti-corruption powers

    May 16, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    State Capture update: Transnet and Nedbank interest rate swaps settlement

    January 20, 2026

    South Africa is off the FATF Greylist

    October 29, 2025

    SIU V Zakheni Strategic Supplies (Pty) Ltd and Others

    August 25, 2025

    SIU V Bendalo Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others

    August 19, 2025
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    About Us
    About Us

    The Progress Report delivers clear, factual reporting on South Africa’s fight against corruption, focusing on the efforts of the Special Tribunal and Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts.
    We track key cases, provide in-depth analysis of judgments, and advocate for critical reforms to enhance transparency and accountability. Our mission is to spotlight successes in recovering stolen funds, identify challenges faced by these institutions, and rebuild public trust in the justice system.

    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Latest News

    State Capture update: Transnet and Nedbank interest rate swaps settlement

    January 20, 2026

    South Africa is off the FATF Greylist

    October 29, 2025

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025
    Cases in the Spotlight

    SIU V Zakheni Strategic Supplies (Pty) Ltd and Others

    August 25, 2025

    SIU V Bendalo Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others

    August 19, 2025

    SIU v Kroucamp Plumbers (Pty.) Ltd. and others

    July 30, 2025
    • Homepage
    © 2026 The Progress Report. Designed by Edge Digital.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.