Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

    June 27, 2025

    SIU v Dlamini and Others

    June 25, 2025

    [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

    June 20, 2025

    What about the Zondo Commission?

    June 4, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Progress ReportProgress Report
    • News
    • Contact us
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    • Home
    • Monitoring Corruption
      • Who we are
      • Our mission
      • Why our campaign matters
      • Our objectives
    • Success Stories
      • Special Tribunal Cases
        • SIU v Digital Vibes (Pty) Ltd and Others
        • SIU and Eskom ABB Corruption Settlement
        • SIU and Transnet v Dynamic Power Case
        • SIU v Ledla Case
        • SIU v SAP Case
        • SIU and Another v Ndlovu and Others case
      • SCCC Cases
        • The State v Hildegard Antionette Pieterse
        • The State v Michelle Nunes and Rudi John Baker
    • Accountability
      • Civil vs. Criminal Cases in corruption prosecutions
      • Special Tribunal
        • All about the Special Tribunal
          • The Special Tribunal: Fighting Corruption in South Africa
          • What is the Special Tribunal?
          • Key functions of the Special Tribunal
          • How does the Special Tribunal work?
          • The Special Investigating Unit (SIU)
          • Key powers of the SIU
          • SIU expertise
          • How do the SIU and Special Tribunal work together?
          • Unique features of the Special Tribunal
          • Is the Special Tribunal a Court?
          • Why is the Special Tribunal important?
        • Special Tribunal Timeline
        • Who sits on the Special Tribunal?
        • Success of the Special Tribunal
      • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
        • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
          • Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts
          • What are Commercial Crimes?
          • What are the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts?
          • Why were the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts set up?
          • What is the Specialised Commercial Crimes Unit and how does it work?
          • Where are the Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts and how many are there?
      • View all current corruption cases on Law.Library
    • Updates
      • Cases
      • News
    Visit Judges Matter
    Progress ReportProgress Report
    Home»Cases»SIU v Dlamini and Others
    Cases

    SIU v Dlamini and Others

    June 25, 20254 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
    The Special Tribunal was asked to block a former NLC official from accessing his pension after he allegedly co-signed a fabricated report that led to the payment of R3 million in public funds. This case tests the Tribunal’s power to preserve retirement funds pending civil recovery.
    The Special Tribunal was asked to block a former NLC official from accessing his pension after he allegedly co-signed a fabricated report that led to the payment of R3 million in public funds. This case tests the Tribunal’s power to preserve retirement funds pending civil recovery.

    Background and context

    In the matter of Special Investigating Unit (SIU) v Sanele Dlamini and Others, the Special Tribunal was asked to prohibit Mr Dlamini, a former senior manager of the National Lotteries Commission (NLC), from accessing or prejudicing his pension funds held by Liberty Life Insurance.

    The SIU brought the application following its investigation into irregularities in NLC grant funding. Proclamation 32 of 2020 authorised the investigation, which revealed that R9 million in grant funding awarded to the Motheo Foundation was allegedly misappropriated.

    A R70 000 grant application was initially rejected, but on the same day, a R9 million proactive funding proposal was approved for a sports complex, to be paid in two tranches. The SIU’s investigation found that the first tranche of R3.5 million was not used for the intended project but instead shared among individuals as undue gratification. The second tranche of R3 million was paid based on a fabricated progress report signed by Mr Dlamini and Ms Maodi, an executive assistant to the NLC CEO with no authority to approve such reports. Notably, the SIU highlighted that Ms Maodi had a close personal relationship with Mr Sedibi of the Motheo Foundation, further raising concerns about collusion. Mr Dlamini was dismissed by the NLC on 4 October 2024 following a disciplinary process.

    The SIU then sought to preserve Mr Dlamini’s pension benefits under section 37D of the Pension Funds Act as security for possible recovery.

    Judgment of the Special Tribunal

    Judge Margaret Victor, President of the Tribunal, delivered a comprehensive judgment, outlining the requirements for granting an interim interdicts and the Tribunal’s authority.

    Key findings:

    • The Tribunal affirmed that section 37D(1)(b)(ii) of the Pension Funds Act allows employers to secure claims arising from dishonest conduct by employees, provided a judgment is obtained. The provision entitles an employer to deduct any amount due by a member as compensation for damage caused by theft, dishonesty, fraud or misconduct, if a judgment has been obtained against the member in any court, including the Magistrates’ Court. The NLC’s disciplinary finding of gross misconduct with elements of dishonesty satisfied this requirement.
    • The Tribunal confirmed that the SIU had established a prima facie right, given that Mr Dlamini co-signed a fabricated progress report that led to the payment of R3 million. The Tribunal held that there was a reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm should the pension benefits be released and found that the SIU’s main application had reasonable prospects of success.
    • The Tribunal acknowledged that it is arguable that it may not ultimately have the authority to order a deduction from a pension fund, as it is not a court of law. However, it noted that the SIU Act confers jurisdiction on the Tribunal to adjudicate civil proceedings, and that these questions must be determined in the main application.
    • Accordingly, questions regarding the proper interpretation of section 37D of the Pension Funds Act do not present a legal obstacle to granting interim relief.

        Order

        • Mr Dlamini was interdicted from accessing or diminishing the value of his pension funds held by Corporate Selection Umbrella Retirement Fund. Liberty Life, the NLC, and the Motheo Foundation were similarly interdicted from paying out or otherwise dealing with the pension benefits.

        Timeline of events

        Date Event
        6 November 2020Proclamation 32 of 2020 gazetted
        14 April 2021 Motheo Foundation reject funding of R70 000.00, and proactive funding of R9 million to Motheo Foundation approved
        Mid-to-late 2021 First R 3 596 637.61 payment made by NLC to Motheo Foundation
        February 2022 Second R3 million payment made following fabricated progress reports
        11 December 2023 NLC disciplinary inquiry into Mr Dlamini’s conduct initiated
        27 September 2024 Mr Dlamini found guilty by Chair of NLC disciplinary inquiry
        4 October 2024 Mr Dlamini dismissed from employment
        14 October 2024 SIU instituted main civil proceedings
        12 March 2025 Mr Dlamini applies to access pension funds
        28 February 2025 SIU files urgent interdict application
        30 April 2025 Hearing held
        10 June 2025 Judgment handed down

        Conclusion

        This judgment affirms the Tribunal’s role in preserving public funds while civil recovery proceedings are ongoing. It clarifies that while the Tribunal’s power to order deductions from pension funds remains a matter for the main application, interim preservation of such funds is both lawful and necessary to safeguard potential recoveries. The ruling sends a strong message: public officials implicated in dishonesty cannot evade accountability by accessing their retirement funds before due legal process concludes.

        This case highlights the important role the Special Tribunal plays in ensuring public funds are protected while investigations and civil claims are pursued. The Progress Report will continue to track this and other key cases, reporting on the outcomes, legal developments, and challenges, to keep the public informed and institutions accountable.

        Corruption Dlamini Judge Margaret Victor NLC grant funding public funds Sanele Dlamini
        Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email
        Previous Article[MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING
        Next Article Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

        Related Posts

        News

        What about the Zondo Commission?

        June 4, 2025
        Cases

        Marubini Ramatsekisa v SIU and Others

        May 23, 2025
        Cases

        SIU v Mosokodi Business Trust and Others

        May 13, 2025
        News

        Unmasking money laundering in South Africa

        May 7, 2025
        Cases

        SIU v Digital Vibes (Pty) Ltd and Others

        March 7, 2025
        Cases

        The State v Hildegard Antionette Pieterse

        March 7, 2025
        Add A Comment
        Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

        Top Posts

        Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

        June 27, 2025

        SIU v Dlamini and Others

        June 25, 2025

        [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

        June 20, 2025

        What about the Zondo Commission?

        June 4, 2025
        Stay In Touch
        • Facebook
        • Twitter
        • LinkedIn
        About Us
        About Us

        The Progress Report delivers clear, factual reporting on South Africa’s fight against corruption, focusing on the efforts of the Special Tribunal and Specialised Commercial Crimes Courts.
        We track key cases, provide in-depth analysis of judgments, and advocate for critical reforms to enhance transparency and accountability. Our mission is to spotlight successes in recovering stolen funds, identify challenges faced by these institutions, and rebuild public trust in the justice system.

        Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
        Latest News

        Strengthening the Special Tribunal – A Case for Reform

        June 27, 2025

        [MEDIA STATEMENT] SOUTH AFRICA MAKES SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS ON FATF GREYLISTING

        June 20, 2025

        What about the Zondo Commission?

        June 4, 2025
        Cases in the Spotlight

        SIU v Dlamini and Others

        June 25, 2025

        Marubini Ramatsekisa v SIU and Others

        May 23, 2025

        SIU v Mosokodi Business Trust and Others

        May 13, 2025
        • Homepage
        © 2025 The Progress Report. Designed by Edge Digital.

        Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.